Business Technology Roundtable

Four years into the Wharton Human-AI Research and GBK Collective tracking study, artificial intelligence adoption is no longer the story. Among managers and above, 62 percent now use AI daily, and 73 percent say it has significantly changed how their department works. Positive returns are near-universal, at 80 percent. The problem sits one rung higher. Only 28 percent report strongly positive returns, and just 7 percent of organizations succeed on all three of the study’s success markers: proving value, transforming workflows, and aligning the organization behind a cohesive strategy. That 52-point gap between positive and strongly positive is where executive attention now belongs. Funding for Transformation, Measuring for Convenience Here is the tension at the center of the data. Some 83 percent of managers and above expect Applied-AI to fundamentally transform or majorly affect their industry within two to five years. Yet the most common test departments apply to their own AI spend is...

Every enterprise software vendor now has an AI agent story. Far fewer can explain what happens when that agent calls the wrong tool, inherits the wrong permissions, or quietly works around a constraint to look successful. A new OECD and GPAI paper, built on interviews with 25 organizations, offers one of the first practitioner-level views of that gap. For executives, the message is clear. Agentic AI is moving into real workflows faster than the IT controls designed to contain it. A Leading-Edge Sample, Not a Median One The OECD contacted 74 organizations and interviewed those that agreed to participate within the timeframe.  They span frontier developers, enterprise adopters, and government agencies across 11 countries, and every one was already working on Agentic AI. The authors are candid that the findings are illustrative rather than representative. My read is that this makes the paper more useful, not less. If the leaders still struggle with these problems, the typical enterpri...

Every enterprise racing to deploy Agentic AI is making an infrastructure decision it may not recognize as one. When an AI agent connects to internal systems and proprietary content, the protocol governing that connection determines whether the enterprise controls the terms of access or cedes them by default. Model Context Protocol (MCP) has become the standard linking agents to backend data and tools, and it is spreading through corporate technology stacks faster than the governance frameworks meant to secure it.  For CIOs and CISOs, this stopped being a developer tooling question months ago. It is now a sovereignty question: who defines the boundary between an AI agent and a company's proprietary intelligence. The MCP Adoption Security Gap Gartner projects that by 2028, 25 percent of all enterprise Generative AI (GenAI) applications will experience at least five minor security incidents per year, up from 9 percent in 2025. That trajectory tracks closely with how fast MCP has been ...

Applied-AI adoption inside enterprises has nearly tripled in four years, moving from roughly 7 percent of OECD firms in 2021 to 20 percent in 2025. Over the same stretch of time, the share of the workforce demonstrating recognized AI skills has barely cleared 1 percent. That gap, not the pace of AI model releases, is the strategic problem every C-suite now has to own and purposefully resolve. The Widening Gap Between Deployment and Capability Half of small and medium enterprises now cite a lack of skills as the reason they have not adopted generative AI tools, according to the OECD's newly declassified paper, Skills in the AI Age. Across 10 member countries, roughly one third of job vacancies already sit in occupations with high AI exposure, a share expected to keep climbing as generative tools embed themselves in everyday workplace software. Executives who treat this as a training line item rather than a workforce architecture problem will spend the next few years chasing a target...

A strategic business case and global market assessment The enterprise artificial intelligence landscape is undergoing a profound structural transition, particularly with the Professional Services related industries. As AI foundation models commoditize basic text generation and public datasets reach cognitive density limits, forward-thinking organizations are realizing that generic intelligence offers no sustainable competitive advantage. In response, enterprise architects and strategic advisors are shifting focus toward architectures that capture, structure, and monetize internal institutional knowledge. Central to this structural pivot is the concept of the Proprietary Intelligence Foundry. The foundry represents a strategic pipeline framework designed to transform an enterprise's undocumented human judgment into a permanent, defensible, and sovereign digital asset. Conceptual Foundations The Proprietary Intelligence Foundry is defined as a strategic pipeline architecture that cap...

In June, I wrote about why AI training had moved inside the enterprise : the open web has run dry of the cognitive density frontier models now need, and the next phase of the Applied-AI race would be won on access to human tacit knowledge, not public data. I said the leading tech vendors had already restructured to capture it. What I didn't have yet was a single, undeniable proof point of a professional services firm making the same bet with its own money. Now I do. Kirkland & Ellis, the world's highest-grossing law firm, is spending roughly $500 million of its own revenue over the next three to four years building proprietary AI systems it will own outright. A meaningful piece of that is a co-built platform with Palantir called the Fund Formation Engine, designed to run private-equity fund documentation, side-letter drafting, and obligation tracking across Kirkland's fund-formation practice. Kirkland didn't pick Palantir for its model. It picked Palantir for its on...