Skip to main content

About

Exploring Business Technology Trends


geoactive-group
Today, the applications of digital transformation technology are an integral part of every business in most industries. However, while executive decision-makers are primarily concerned with applying technology to pursue new innovative business outcomes, the vendors that they encounter on their buyer's journey sometimes don't speak the same language.

Matching line of business (LoB) buyer needs with technology vendor offerings is often called the "business technology alignment chasm."

Filling that void with substantive information, meaningful guidance, and insightful market research data is the charter of the Business Technology Roundtable (BTR).

Digital transformation describes the changes associated with the application of digital technology within commerce. We seek to shed light where there has been an apparent absence of editorial illumination.

We believe that a 'digital business architect' should be focused more on creating agile business models and driving technology adoption, rather than the acquisition of new systems and services.

CIOs, CTOs, and CDOs should also facilitate the achievement of business productivity goals, utilizing an agile DevOps methodology. Once they're informed about all the viable options, they'll choose the best-fit solutions and seek ongoing knowledge transfer from their preferred IT supplier.

Given this backdrop, we know that successful business technology projects are about changing behavior and organizational culture, in addition to the underlying digital transformation infrastructure.

We've been publishing market research and analysis articles since 2008. I welcome you to BTR and invite you to contact me if you have questions or comments.

David H. Deans | GeoActive Group
Managing Editor and Publisher

Visit our other sites: Digital Lifescapes, and Digital Polymath.

Popular posts from this blog

MCP Governance: The Next Sovereign AI Decision

Every enterprise racing to deploy Agentic AI is making an infrastructure decision it may not recognize as one. When an AI agent connects to internal systems and proprietary content, the protocol governing that connection determines whether the enterprise controls the terms of access or cedes them by default. Model Context Protocol (MCP) has become the standard linking agents to backend data and tools, and it is spreading through corporate technology stacks faster than the governance frameworks meant to secure it.  For CIOs and CISOs, this stopped being a developer tooling question months ago. It is now a sovereignty question: who defines the boundary between an AI agent and a company's proprietary intelligence. The MCP Adoption Security Gap Gartner projects that by 2028, 25 percent of all enterprise Generative AI (GenAI) applications will experience at least five minor security incidents per year, up from 9 percent in 2025. That trajectory tracks closely with how fast MCP has been ...