Skip to main content

The More Things Change, The More They Stay the Same


I received an email the other day congratulating me on a column I wrote for NetworkWorld nearly three years ago entitled, "Why Managed Services Fail."

The 'shelf-life' of web content always amazes me, but it is gratifying to have people stumble across my past writings and still find them timely.

What struck me as I revisited this 2005 column was how many of my points were still true,
  • "...Almost every supplier and service provider I talk to admits that selling managed services has been harder than expected."
  • "The first problem these managed service providers face is packaging."
  • "The second issue is pricing."
  • "The third challenge is positioning these services properly."
  • "But the biggest obstacle to selling managed services is poor sales skills."

Sound familiar?
Although industry research clearly shows that customers are becoming more receptive towards managed services and the economy is even driving an increasing number of customers to actively pursue managed service alternatives, many MSPs are still suffering from poor sales and marketing skills to respond to these opportunities.

They are still thinking in terms of selling products rather than services. They are still promoting the 'speeds and feeds' of their technical capabilities rather than the business value of their service capabilities.

As a consequence, many MSPs end up selling their services to IT managers who are only interested in continuing to buy systems and software rather than selling solutions to higher level decision makers who are interested in the business impact of their services.

Worthy of Your Business?
So, if you are an IT or business decision-maker who is seeking to acquire managed services, don't be surprised if your potential MSPs are talking to you in the wrong terms and trying to sell you the wrong value propositions.

Popular posts from this blog

Why the Future of AI is Agentic but Precarious

We have now entered the AI Agentic era, according to the latest series of reports by Google's artificial intelligence (AI) researchers. The shift from passive generative AI models to autonomous AI agents that can plan, reason, and act on our behalf is the most profound digital transformation in decades. As  Applied-AI Initiatives replace deterministic code, a significant challenge has emerged. Building an AI agent is easy; however, trusting it is complex. The current AI market momentum reveals a stark last-mile gap. While a developer can spin up an AI prototype in minutes, roughly 80 percent of the effort required to reach production is consumed by the work of safety, validation, and infrastructure. The reason is simple: AI agents are non-deterministic. They can pass 100 unit tests but fail catastrophically in the field because of a flaw in their judgment, not a bug in the code. Core Architecture and the Problem-Solving Loop An Applied-AI agent is defined by the synergy of four co...