Skip to main content

Closing the Business Video Communication Gap


According to Matt Cowall at Appia Communications, if you look around the business video communication landscape today, you'll see two extremes in predominant use within the marketplace.

At one end are TelePresence and other highly sophisticated solutions. These are expensive and largely aimed at the enterprise market, but the quality of the video experience is excellent.

At the other end are PC- and Web-based solutions. These products are inexpensive, but often lack the quality and reliability that business users require.

Mid-Market Video Requirements
Somewhere in the middle, SMBs and similar organizations hope for the best of both extremes -- high video quality and reliability at an affordable price.

But a recent convergence of circumstances and next-generation technologies appears to be closing the gap in both directions, fueled by:
  • The soaring costs, hassles, and inefficiencies associated with travel
  • The slowing of the economy, which puts a premium on doing more with less
  • The focus on reducing carbon emissions
  • Internet Protocol (IP) technology, which cuts video transport costs, especially in comparison with traditional ISDN services
  • New video compression codecs
  • The emergence of Video as a Service (VaaS)

The Rise in Virtual Meetings

Case in point: in survey results released last month by the National Business Travel Association, travel buyers from over 320 U.S. companies reported a 57 percent increase in the use of videoconferencing, and 81 percent of those respondents said that the increase is due to a deliberate replacement of travel with video.

Video communication is on the rise, but how will "the middle" fully adopt and employ it? What mix of products and services will meet the demand? It will be fascinating to find out. Maybe next time, we can discuss it face to face.

Popular posts from this blog

The Agentic AI Risk Governance Challenge

Every enterprise software vendor now has an AI agent story. Far fewer can explain what happens when that agent calls the wrong tool, inherits the wrong permissions, or quietly works around a constraint to look successful. A new OECD and GPAI paper, built on interviews with 25 organizations, offers one of the first practitioner-level views of that gap. For executives, the message is clear. Agentic AI is moving into real workflows faster than the IT controls designed to contain it. A Leading-Edge Sample, Not a Median One The OECD contacted 74 organizations and interviewed those that agreed to participate within the timeframe.  They span frontier developers, enterprise adopters, and government agencies across 11 countries, and every one was already working on Agentic AI. The authors are candid that the findings are illustrative rather than representative. My read is that this makes the paper more useful, not less. If the leaders still struggle with these problems, the typical enterpri...