Skip to main content

Redefining Vendor/Customer Relationships


My colleague, Joe Panettieri, reports that Dell has won its largest managed services agreement ever with the state of Georgia.

This contract illustrates how Dell, and other technology vendors, are shifting their go-to-market strategies to respond to customers' changing IT management needs.

Anyone who follows the technology industry knows that Dell has been struggling to keep pace with HP when it comes to computer sales. What few casual observers have recognized is how Dell has amassed a new set of remote management capabilities via a series of acquistions over the past year and a half.

Why Managed Services Matter
During that time, Dell has acquired SilverBack Technologies, Everdream, EqualLogic and MessageOne to serve as the foundation for a new portfolio of Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) and managed service capabilities.

Dell understands that it will have a difficult time outpacing HP and other technology vendors on the strength of its products alone as laptops, desktops and servers become more commoditized.

Instead, Dell and other vendors must differentiate themselves on their ability to help customers generate the greatest value from their systems. This means redefining their services to help customers, and their channel partners, better manage these assets to optimize their performance.

Redefining the Meaning of Support
The most cost-effective way for vendors to monitor these devices and proactively administer them is via managed services. The best way for them to offer these capabilities to their channel partners or customers is via SaaS solutions.

These 'on-demand' services redefine the nature of vendor/customer relationships. Customers no longer have to assume the responsibility for managing their systems and software, and wait for their vendors to respond to their problems when something goes wrong.

Now, they can shift the burden on their vendor to ensure the uptime and performance of their systems and software. By the same token, vendors can no longer boast about their customer support response times. Instead, they must demonstrate their willingness to take on this greater responsibility.

Popular posts from this blog

MCP Governance: The Next Sovereign AI Decision

Every enterprise racing to deploy Agentic AI is making an infrastructure decision it may not recognize as one. When an AI agent connects to internal systems and proprietary content, the protocol governing that connection determines whether the enterprise controls the terms of access or cedes them by default. Model Context Protocol (MCP) has become the standard linking agents to backend data and tools, and it is spreading through corporate technology stacks faster than the governance frameworks meant to secure it.  For CIOs and CISOs, this stopped being a developer tooling question months ago. It is now a sovereignty question: who defines the boundary between an AI agent and a company's proprietary intelligence. The MCP Adoption Security Gap Gartner projects that by 2028, 25 percent of all enterprise Generative AI (GenAI) applications will experience at least five minor security incidents per year, up from 9 percent in 2025. That trajectory tracks closely with how fast MCP has been ...